无忧范文网小编为你整理了多篇《国王的演讲英语观后感(范文5篇)》范文，希望对您的工作学习有帮助，你还可以在无忧范文网可以找到更多《国王的演讲英语观后感(范文5篇)》。
第一篇：国王的演讲观后感
《国王的演讲》是一部历史片，讲述了英国国王乔治六世和他的语言治疗师莱纳尔罗的故事。这个“被国王”的国王，一辈子活在父亲跟哥哥的阴影下，这皇帝患有严重的口吃。国难当头，政局危机，在语言治疗师的帮忙下，一步一步战胜口吃，最终发布了一场令全国人民活力洋溢、热血沸腾的精彩反战演讲。必须说，这个故事本身并不新奇，甚至于能够说，这样的故事，在那些所谓的自诩为“心灵鸡汤”的杂志中，随便就能找到。可这个电影还是胜出了。“电影很励志，人要战胜的始终是自己”，这是大多数媒体对《国王的演讲》的评价。
“惩罚教育”“否定教育”显然是错误的，结果导致的不只是独立人格的残缺，还会引发各种生理疾患。口吃是复杂的语言失调症，与后天因素有很大的关系，各种负面的心理情绪与外部压力，都会加剧症状的恶化，所以首先要纠其病因，要打开心结，治疗心理创伤。这不单单表此刻说话上，我以往见过一个小朋友，他的妈妈责备他学习成绩差，他就会用课本敲打自己的脑子，一敲就是半个小时、一个小时，无法阻止。总之，《国王的演讲》另一方面也探讨了任何家庭中都存在的育儿教子问题，乔治六世给两个小公主讲故事的那段，温馨提示了不再“重复错误”的现身行为。
因为我也是教师吧，我印象最深的是罗格医生，他的背景在整个影片里面可是交代了几句话，可是却让人好像立即就了解了整个人，他本身是一个演员，也做过教师，在战争期间，因为看到很多因为战争变得自闭的青年，因为别人说了一句：你不是语言很行的嘛！就帮忙那些沉默的青年重拾信心，走出自闭的阴霾。他不是医生，可是却能够读懂人的心，善于倾听。相比之下，那些皇宫里的所谓出色的治疗师仅仅是有着文凭的花瓶。所以，我也相信，真正有作为的人，不是那些在外面宣扬自己多么厉害的人，而是用心做事的.人，凭一颗热忱的真诚的心做事的人，你投入了真心，就已经是成功的了。我想到了此刻学校很多的教师，他们只想着怎样提高教学质量，怎样样让学生的分数更高一些，让高考又刷新纪录，可是他们没有真正的关心过学生的成长，没有聆听过学生心里的声音，他们很少站在学生的角度去思考，而只是站在自己的立场去做事情。我们也不否认你投入的真心，可是你的真心里面没有倾听，没有产生学生的共鸣，没有引出学生的求知渴望。
罗格的与众不一样表此刻他善于倾听，真诚的、由衷的倾听病人的谈话，并鼓励他们大胆的表达自己的想法，不管是对还是错，至少要能够随心所欲的表达自己，自信的表达。他是对症下药的，因为国王本身是一个很优秀的人的，无论在哪方面都是很有才华的，唯一的缺憾就是结巴，他热爱政治，热爱他的国家和子民，期望做一个好国王，担当起国王的职责，可是他却是一个结巴，这是多么大的打击啊，所以他首先失去的是信心，他没有勇气在别人面前大胆的说话，勇气是一个多么美妙的词，可是对于国王来讲，那是比什么都难的，因为他从来没有这样的勇气。他甚至以为那是上帝的遗弃，他做不了一个好国王，因为他是一个结巴，不能在公众面前流畅的演讲。
我在想罗格在做教师的时候必须是一个好教师，我们身边有多少教师能够像他一样真正去聆听学生呢，就算是我自己，也是不敢肯定的回答的，因为学业的繁重，我们的重心早就已经转移了，或者说我们的重心一向都是在分数上的，尽管我们总是在谈素质教育，可是真正能够理解素质教育，并在自己的教育中实践的，又有多少人呢？
正如我们校长在我们观看电影前说的一句话：教育中的问题其实就是一种心里的“口吃”，作为一名教师，怎样战胜“口吃”？是我从本部电影中得到的启示。
第二篇：国王的演讲观后感
前几天梦到和colin谈朋友，小鹿乱撞，清晰记得不停游说colin放下我俩年龄差的成见和我在一起，好吧，由此决定今晚抽空看了国王的演讲。这部colin拿小金人的电影。
喜欢colin是在去年决定放下成见去看95版的傲慢与偏见，不得不承认他演的傲慢达西是最吸引人的，你很难说出到底colin在外观上哪点非常出类拔萃，但他就是非常的有魅力，从声音、身段到脸，用一个字形容就是苏，无论是现在的他还是青葱时期的他。我想这样的人可以称之为男神了。
一开始看这部电影其实并没有抱太大的期望，colin的演技在我的印象中仿佛被他的口音束缚住了，因为自身懒看的少带有这方面的偏见，并且对口吃演讲这种沉重的话题不感冒，但所有的偏见止于今晚。
整部电影无尿点，很难想象一部不是以紧凑剧情或者动作场面为主的'电影可以做到这点，一部文艺片因为好的编剧好的拍摄和恰到好处的演员们呈现了几乎完美的银幕。这部电影从头到尾都弥漫着淡淡的悲伤，乔治六世口吃的原因随着剧情的推进渐渐浮现，幼年时的各种矫正成就了现在的他，哪怕有罗格的存在，他也仿佛一生都要为此奋斗，为了顺畅的演讲而奋斗还是在有稿子可以念得情况下。结局他完成了一次成功的演讲，但我的心情陷入了低谷，我在他身上看到了自身的影子。
很庆幸自身还没严重到口吃，不过小时候一次次严苛的打断足以让我长大后畏手畏脚说话自卑打结，树立信心可能是我一辈子的事业。高考前优秀的成绩让我不必因为公开说话而感受到自卑的存在，我让自身逃避了18年，到了大学觉得时间到了，我开始肆无忌惮的在各个场合进行各种丢人现眼的演讲，好吧，其实我每次都很努力结果就是这次好下次差的不停循环往复，论思路和方向的把握我自信做到比大部分人好，但我说不出，除了自言自语的时候。这种悲哀仿佛身临其境的在电影中感受到，时时暴露的演讲其实对自信心的提升并没有什么卵用，好吧，其实会有些用处，例如说在会议厅演讲的时候屁字都蹦不出来就不怎么会在课堂演讲紧张到什么都说不出，原来需要两个礼拜在荒废的厕所对着破镜子练习演讲，后来可以从拿到题目开始准备PPT到完成所有准备不超过两小时，依然在台上表现不错，被院长夸奖，变化总是有，但我知道我本质害怕紧张的心没有变，它从小伴随着我的成长深深地烙在了我的身上。
最近，在工作中承担了较大的责任，看到刚上任国王的colin又想到了自身，就是那样彷徨，仿佛扭曲逃避的人格从未远离，在每一次的挑战前爆发，对喜欢安逸的自身来说简直就是灾难，害怕也没用，执拗的强势性格总是在和懦弱自卑的自身相抗衡，看了这部电影我才发现，这应该是一辈子的事，曾经我以为我已经战胜了，原来它以另外一种形式来到了我身边。
看完整部电影，觉得有的时候，人类真是神奇明明怕的要死还硬着头皮上，算算自身也就年少无知的时候做过几回逃兵，其他的时候都扛下来了，乔治六世的挣扎我想应该会持续一生吧，我的呢，应该也会吧，毕竟不去对抗，我都不知道自身还能做成什么。
不得不说一下colin的演技，非常的用力，一个带着colin味道的乔治六世他演绎的相当成功，一部电影没有给我到鼓舞反而让我认清到了之前罔顾的现实，不愧是包揽了多项奥斯卡的电影。
第三篇：《国王的演讲》观后感Theking'sspeechinEnglishaboutit
It is a quite inspiring story about a man, psychologically scarred, and trapped in a situation from which he could have no escape and facing it with immense courage. The movie starts off with a stammering speech and signs off with a staggering one, with hardly any glitches in between. The basic premise of the movie is fairly simple. A king with a stutter is helped by a maverick speech therapist to overcome his problem and become an inspiring orator. That sounds like a very known territory to most movie goers. But few minutes into the movie, and you realize that this one simply pushes the bar a notch higher.
The film conveyed very powerfully in the opening scene, the enormity of what was required of him. As the film develops, the complexities of the character are revealed. The acting is superb, especially from the three principals, and the development of the troubled and spark relationship at the heart of the film is a joy to watch. The film is very funny and the characters have warmth and humanity. The film is well paced, and carries you along to the emotional climax, so that, even though I knew the story, it had me holding my breath. If you don't need lots of action or special effects in your film, and enjoy seeing top-notch actors at the very peak of their craft, this will be for you. You might also, as I did, gain a bit more insight into the human drama behind a significant, but relatively unexplored period of British history.
国王的演讲英文观后感(The king's speech in English about it)
This is a biopic about how King George VI, the father of Queen Elizabeth II, overcame his stuttering problem. Widely considered by all but his father unfit to be king, George is reluctantly thrust unto the throne and into the spotlight after his brother is forced to abdicate. Overshadowed on the global stage by powerful orators like Adolph Hitler and Benito Mussolini, the King relies on the help of a little-known Australian speech therapist named Lionel Logue to find his voice and courageously lead his people into the most devastating war humanity has ever faced.
This is a powerful, hilarious and deeply moving story, told against the backdrop of a critical juncture in modern history, of the emergence of a deep friendship out of a professional relationship between two men who would otherwise never have socially interacted. The screenplay, written by David Seidler (who also wrote Tucker: The Man and his Dream), is excellent. The dry British wit is hilarious. I was literally slapping my knee during some of the scenes. Tom Hooper (Elizabeth I) does a superb job directing this movie. The buildup to the climactic finale is skillfully executed and prompted the audience to erupt into spontaneous applause. (Apparently, this also happened at the Roy Thomson Hall premiere.) Geoffrey Rush (Elizabeth: The Golden Age) does a fantastic job as Lionel Logue and Colin Firth (A Single Man) is excellent as King George VI.
I saw the second public screening of this movie at the Ryerson Theater during the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF). Tom Hooper was present to introduce the movie. He was joined by Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush after the movie ended for a brief Q&A.
It turns out that David Seidler also had a stuttering problem as a child and drew inspiration from the king's struggle. Early in his career he wanted to write a screenplay about it. He dutifully asked the Queen Mother for permission. She agreed but told him "not in my lifetime". Little did he know she would live to be 101 and he would have to wait another 30 years.
Another interesting tidbit we learned was that near the end of the shoot, the crew finally located one of Lionel Logue's grandsons, who just so happened to live about 10 minutes away from the director. They got access to Lionel's diaries and correspondence and managed to incorporate some of it into the script.
This movie is an unqualified must see.
第四篇：国王的演讲观后感
和影片的片名一样，《国王的演讲》一开始给人的感觉是波澜不惊，和好莱坞大片的气质相去甚远，与去年奥斯卡最佳影片《拆弹部队》对现代战争背景下的人性思考也十分不同。但波澜不惊决不是清汤寡水，《国王的演讲》仿佛一出内敛而精致的戏剧，在低调中酝酿出深厚，在深厚中铺展出令人动容的力量。
影片的故事情节非常简单，取材于真实的历史事件。英国国王乔治六世从小患有严重的口吃，最后，在莱昂纳尔的治疗下，终于克服口齿，发表了振奋人心的演讲。这个简单朴实的故事之所以会产生那么大的戏剧张力，首先就是因为细小的事情发生在了重大的历史人物和历史事件身上。时值二战，作为一国之象征的国王，需要发表演讲来凝聚人心。在这样的背景下，口吃治疗就变得尤为重要，细小的事情变得兹事体大。
国王能否被治好口吃，成为整部影片最大的戏剧张力，一直到最后，在莱昂纳尔的"指挥"下，乔治六世终于完整进行了战前演讲，观众才会舒一口气。影片的张力还来自于国王和治疗师本身，这是两个身份差距很大的人，一个是国王，一个只是普通的治疗师，国王的性格不仅内向，还容易愤怒，总有居高临下的气势。这种因为身份差异带来的个性碰撞也成为影片的亮点。治疗师莱昂纳尔的角色在这个碰撞过程中显得尤为出彩，他并没有因为治疗对象是国王而卑躬屈膝，他要求国王打破常规，到自己简陋的治疗室来接受治疗，一副"我的地盘听我的"的架势，他用自己不卑不亢的耐心和诚恳，最终打开了国王坚固的心扉，找到了国王幼年的心理阴影。
与此同时，影片对国王的描述，也是用的'一种平视的镜头，国王虽然有着崇高的地位，但同时有着普通人的缺点，影片把乔治六世饱受口吃之苦的情状展现得淋漓尽致。在别人以为当众说话是一件很容易的事情，在乔治六世那里，却是一件艰难无比的事情。在这个意义上，《国王的演讲》也是一部励志片，而且因为是国王克服内心困境的努力，励志的力量就显得更大。当国王在麦克风前憋得满脸通红，痛苦万分，但终于完整做完演讲，影片的励志力量也让人生出了绵长的感动。
网上有人建议陈凯歌导演看看这部影片，这个建议真是恰当得很。一拍国王，我们总是忍不住宏大叙事，但《国王的演讲》却在一个普通和细微的故事中，拍出了深厚、浩渺的意味，奥斯卡的评委们肯定明白，感动人心的力量不一定个来自于宏大的命题，国王的口吃，同样能让人思索良多。
第五篇：国王的演讲英文观后感
The Kings Speech is both a lot funnier and, strangely, a lot more polite than youd probably expect.
The humour mostly comes from Geoffrey Rushs speech therapist, who aims to cure Colin Firths Duke of Yorks terrible stammer. And this is increasingly imperative; as the film begins, reigning monarch King George V （Michael Gambon） is ailing. There is some controversy over the next-in-line C Guy Pearces Edward. Not only is Edward a bi-plane-flying, party-loving socialite but he is also in a relationship with American divorcee Wallis Simpson （Eve Best）。 Marrying her would cause a constitutional crisis C and potentially rip apart the Church of England.
With the advent of radio, the monarch must be able to speak well, and Firth may well be in the job sooner than he thinks. After trying many options, wife Helena Bonham Carters Elizabeth finally turns to an Antipodean, specialising in some rather unconventional techniques,(www.fwsir.com) based on Londons Harley Street. The Duke and the speech therapist form an unlikely friendship, verbally and even physically bouncing off each other with middle-aged abandon.
These scenes are the backbone of the film. They are funny, entertaining and performed by two actors obviously enjoying themselves enormously. Geoffrey Rush delivers great line after great line and Firth reacts with a deadpan straightness. Youd wish there would be more of these moments. Additional comedy comes from some of the background characters. For instance, Timothy Spalls Winston Churchill rides the line of parody （mostly） successfully.
As for the films politeness C some of it comes, predictably, from Firths monarch-in-waiting. Hes mild-mannered and sensitive royalty, and Firth employs a similarly understated approach than that of his work in A Single Man. The portrayal is quintessentially English, and as good as weve come to expect from Firth recently.
The remaining politeness comes from the films level of drama. There are crown-loads of dramatic potential here C the troublesome father-son relationship between Gambons truculent, demanding monarch and Firths stammering son; the tension coming from the American interloper; the painful, unfolding, prelude to the Second World War playing out C but its all background noise. Sometimes it feels forgotten about entirely, and historical perspective is, almost tastelessly, lost. And although there is a definite direction and development throughout the movie, theres only a sprinkling of edge-of-your-seat material. Any drama is tentative and inoffensive.
So, although there is a lot of humour, crowd-pleasing fun and some award-worthy performances, there is a lack of edge and darkness here. Triumph over adversity is fine if you get the measure of bitter and sweetness right. The Kings Speech fails, and the end result is questionable and problematic.
